’m not sure what to make of the Himalayan blackberry.
Except when I happen to have a bowl of vanilla ice cream.
This temporarily clarifies the situation.
A handful of blackberries, dusted with a skim of sugar and gently
bruised with the back of a spoon to release their pungent juice, can
transform a scoop of soft serve into a dessert that’s positively
My predicament, though, has nothing to do with the various culinary
uses of the blackberry. These, ranging from cobblers to jams to
munching them fresh-plucked, are pretty much above reproach.
What I can’t figure out is whether, speaking ecologically rather than gastronomically, I’m for the fruit or against it.
The thing is, the Himalayan (also known as the Armenian) blackberry, according to biologists, is a noxious weed.
And we’re supposed to abhor those.
It’s been a strange summer in Baker County, weather-wise, but in my estimation a particularly pleasant one.
The season, should its current patterns persist clear through until
autumn, now scarcely a month away, will rank as an especially moderate
example of its kind.
This pleases me because our summers, when they diverge any great distance from average, tend to be decidedly uncomfortable.
Abnormally hot summers, for instance, annoy me because they soil what
seems to me the essential reward of this golden season. This of course
is the ability to go outdoors wearing a minimum of clothing and not
worry overmuch about whether you’ve memorized the proper remedies for
I’m troubled, albeit slightly, by a federal judge’s ruling last week
declaring California’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional.
But the cause for my dismay is not that Judge Vaughn Walker sided with those people who believe gay marriage should be legal.
I happen to be one of those people.
I don’t care if two people of the same gender get married.
And it bothers me not a whit if the government deems this legal
arrangement a marriage rather than a civil union or some other silly
So far as I can tell, society would do well to encourage pairs of
adults — any pair of adults — to make lifetime commitments to love one
another and to raise their children in a nurturing environment.
The greater problem in this country, it seems to me, is not that too
many people want to get married but that too many of us can’t stay
I was awakened on a recent morning, and long before dawn, by the bleating of a deer fawn, searching for its mother.
This is the sort of benign annoyance I happily endure for the privilege of sleeping so near to where deer walk.
Which is a slightly less happy circumstance, at least when the
bleating deer happens to be bleating right outside my bedroom window at
Nor did it improve my attitude that the fawn’s plaintive cries had
frightened another youngster, this one a little girl who insisted on
climbing into her parents’ bed.
I can confirm as a result that, on the spectrum of effective
sleep-deprivation techniques, a whining deer falls far short of a
three-year-old who kicks you in the shin every few seconds.
Or someplace more sensitive than the shin.
Although I suppose the fawn’s kick could cause real damage, what with the hard hooves.
The story apparently ended as I hoped it would, with a reunion of mother and offspring.
What an interesting year to run for a seat on the Baker City Council.
In the same sense, you’re perhaps thinking, that swimming across the anaconda- and piranha-infested Amazon would be interesting.
I’ll concede that serving as a councilor has of late been an experience that couldn’t reasonably be described as tranquil.
In the past 14 months the Council has:
• Fired one city manager (Steve Brocato — or, to avoid potential
confusion with city managers named Steve whose last name starts with
“B” — Steve-1); had its top choice for his successor (Tim Johnson)
first accept then reject the Council’s offer; hired a third person
(Steve Bogart, or Steve-2); who announced that he’ll resign Sept. 23.
• Endured a campaign to recall from office two of the four
councilors who voted to fire Brocato (Dennis Dorrah and Beverly Calder).
I don’t hate plastic grocery bags.
I struggle in fact to muster even a respectable level of disdain for these ubiquitous totes.
Although this one time a sack, traveling alone and propelled by the
desert wind, wedged into the rear derailleur of my mountain bike and
mucked up one of the sprockets.
And since I was riding the bike at the time this intrusion was something of a nuisance.
But that paltry anecdote pretty well covers my personal antipathy for this category of container.
This makes me feel rather like an outcast.
The war is over.
And the machines have won.
This dismal outcome could hardly have been otherwise, what with the human race’s curious obsession with automation.
Curious or not, I can go along with this predilection for quite a distance.
I don’t much like the prospect of scrubbing my undershorts on a washboard, for instance.
Or anybody else’s.
And having tussled with a few grudging garage doors in my time —
usually during a rainstorm — I appreciate the brilliance of the
electric, chain-driven opener which hoists the door at the push of a
(I have averted this particular hassle for the past 15 years through
the clever device of owning a home which has no garage. If I had a
garage, though, it would be equipped with an opener.)
Gary Dielman posed the question, in a recent e-mail, why it is that
the Herald allows anonymous comments to be posted on the paper’s Web
site even though that practice is prohibited in the paper edition.
His question is a good one.
Timely, too, since barely more than a month has passed since we added the comment feature to our site.
My answer, in its simplest form, is that the Web page, though it
shares the “Baker City Herald” moniker, is an altogether different
If you’ll forgive my straining the limits of the analogy, I liken
the newspaper to a lion in the zoo, and the Web site to a lion on the
The newspaper is a controlled environment, with its own versions of stout fences and padlocked gates.
We invite readers to tell us what they think, but we won’t publish
their opinions unless they tell us who they are. And like a caged lion,
their diet is limited: 350 words every 15 days.
You can tell a great deal about a town, I think, by having a look at its schools and its churches.
This exercise — literally, if you take a walking tour — shows Baker City to be a place of substance.
For a city which has never, during its 146 years, boasted an official
population of as much as 10,000, Baker seems to me graced with an
inordinate share of noteworthy houses of learning and of worship.
These are solid structures, constructed of stone and brick, heavy
materials largely immune to the harsh climate of a mountain valley.
It is as if the people who designed and who assembled these buildings
understood that this city, so unlike the mining boom camps that
surrounded it, had real staying power, and that its constructions
should reflect that persistence and prominence.
I like to believe that these craftsmen, were they ever of a
philosophical bent, imagined while they were hard at their labors that
a century on the quick footsteps of pupils would yet echo in the halls,
that the preacher’s devotions would still wash over the penitent in
their pews every Sunday.
Anyway I hope they did.
We drove past an abandoned homestead the other day and my wife, Lisa, said that looking at the place made her feel a little sad.
I understand what she means.
It’s hard not to come off a trifle melancholy when you see a pile of
weathered wood, crumbling concrete and rusted cans and realize that on
some distant day children probably scampered happily around this very
patch of ground.
Where today, like as not, you’d end up needing a tetanus shot if you got to messing around.
There are of course quite a number of homesteads in Baker County, and most of them could reasonably be described as abandoned.
And it’s likely that some of the people who did the abandoning were only too happy to be leaving.
This particular encounter wouldn’t have piqued my curiosity except that
the homestead in question stands astride what seems to me an intriguing
intersection — one which is technological and social as well as