>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Baker City's dilemma

Print

Baker City's dilemma


Baker City officials have a dilemma on their hands.

One source is a parasite, cryptosporidium, that can leave you suffering from diarrhea and nausea if it gets into your stomach.

The other source is perhaps even more insidious: the federal government.

The nation’s worst crypto outbreak happened in 1993 in Milwaukee, Wis. More than 400,000 became ill after the city’s drinking water became contaminated with crypto. About 50 people died, most of them AIDS patients or people whose immune systems were weakened by another affliction.

The Milwaukee outbreak prompted the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), about a decade ago, to enact a new rule that affects all public drinking-water systems.

The bottom line for Baker City is that, by Oct. 1, 2016, the city must disinfect its water in a manner that removes the risk of crypto infection.

The city’s current method — adding chlorine dioxide — won’t cut it. The city is proposing instead to bombard its water with ultraviolet light, which, in effect, disables crypto. The estimated cost: $2.5 million.

Here’s the dilemma: The city has tested its water for crypto twice a month since April 2010, and found no evidence of the parasite.

No matter, says the EPA.

Portland, meanwhile, is in the same situation as Baker City. Portland, though, is seeking a waiver from the EPA rule.

Baker City Mayor Dennis Dorrah and Councilor Roger Coles suggested this week that the city, rather than spend $110,000 on preliminary work for a UV system, wait to see how Portland fares.

It’s a tempting idea.

But the Council was wise to vote 4-2, with Dorrah and Coles opposed, to proceed with the work.

As silly as the EPA mandate seems, we don’t want Baker City to incur legal costs or federal fines, and still end up having to install the UV treatment system.

Print

blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use