>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Big load not a big deal


Big load not a big deal

The “megaload” that headed south from the Port of Umatilla Monday evening has attracted far more attention than it deserves, its monumental name notwithstanding.

The water purification machinery is being hauled by truck to a tar sands oil refining plant in Alberta, Canada.

The “mega” refers to the load’s size — 22 feet wide and 380 feet long. Because the load takes up most of a two-lane highway, the truck will travel at night. The route follows Highway 395 south to Highway 26 at Mount Vernon, then east on Highway 26 through Vale. About 25 miles of the route — from near Austin Junction through Unity to near Ironside — is in Baker County.

This first of three planned megaloads has garnered publicity not only because of its size, but also because protesters managed to delay its departure from the Port of Umatilla for one day. Two protesters locked themselves to the truck on Sunday. Both were charged with misdemeanor disorderly conduct.

Protesters have two main objections to the megaload: that the tar sands oil operation will contribute to global warming, and that the megaload itself poses a risk to the Eastern Oregon environment.

As for the first complaint, there’s no reason to believe that the oil plant will be abandoned because one load of equipment is delayed. We would respect the protesters if they pursued their grievance in a legal way through the courts or environmental regulations. That method not only has a better chance of succeeding, but it also doesn’t affect the trucking company and other workers who are trying to make a living in a legal enterprise. Those workers are far more likely to be harmed by protests than the owners of the oil company are.

The concern about direct damage from the megaload seems to us greatly exaggerated. Every day trucks on Interstate 84 and trains on the Union Pacific tracks haul vastly more dangerous cargo, at much higher speeds, through the region.

The megaload itself contains no hazardous materials, save for the diesel in the truck that’s hauling it.

Its very size, which requires that the truck travel no faster than 35 mph, makes an accident unlikely. 


blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2016 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use