>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Good neighbors

Good neighbors


Baker City’s rare, privately owned complex of four grass tennis courts continues to generate controversy.

Sorting out the current disagreement could prove trickier than past conflicts, though.

At issue is the extent to which the city should, or legally can, limit how, and how often, the courts are used.

In one respect this is a simple matter. A 2004 conditional-use permit allows the courts’ owner, Don McClure, to play host to tournament play on no more than 22 days per year, spread among a maximum of six separate events.

The city can’t legally allow McClure to exceed those limits because doing so would constitute an expansion of the courts, which are already a “non-conforming use” in urban planning lingo.

But this summer, some neighbors who contend that noise from the courts is disruptive have posed a different question: What about so-called “social” play, when people are using the courts but not competing in an official tournament?

Trouble is, the conditional-use permit doesn’t mention, much less define, “social play.”

But it’s abundantly clear, based on the history of complaints about the grass courts that date back more than a decade, that the root of the issue is how the use of the courts — whether you call it a tournament or social play or just plain old exercise — affects neighbors.

It would neither be fair to the neighbors, nor consistent with the spirit of land-use law, for the city to allow unlimited use of the grass courts except on those 22 “tournament” days.

That’s a gaping loophole.

To that end, City Planner Jenny Long said she has asked McClure and others associated with the courts to propose “boundaries” on social play.

That’s a reasonable request.

It would be appropriate, for instance, for McClure to agree to prohibit, or at least restrict, social play on a few weekends during summer.

The neighbors would undoubtedly appreciate such a gesture.

We think it’s even more important, though, for McClure and members of Save the Grass Courts Association (SAGA), the nonprofit group that organizes tournaments, to encourage visiting players to act responsibly while they’re on the property.

To be good neighbors, in other words.

We don’t doubt that the vast majority of people who visit the grass courts are just that.

But perhaps an occasional reminder — and maybe posting a sign or two — would eliminate those rare instances of bad behavior that seem to be responsible for much of the hard feelings that have flared occasionally among neighbors since the grass courts were built.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use