There can be no doubt that Oregon, and every other state, will have to devise a method other than fuel taxes to pay to maintain and build roads and bridges.
The taxation system that states, and the federal government, have relied on for decades works so long as the vast majority of vehicles plying our roads burn petroleum products taxed at the pump.
Today that still accurately describes the nation’s vehicle fleet.
But a decade from now it might not.
Electric cars and hybrids will wean us off oil, but in doing so they’ll also cut off the flow of fuel tax dollars.
The Oregon Board of Education might decide on Thursday to require 15 public high schools to do away with their mascots or logos, by 2017, because the symbols are associated with Native Americans.
We hope board members choose not to impose this one-size-fits-all edict on schools with mascots such as Warriors, Braves and Indians.
This is not to say that the concern which motivated the board’s discussion — that such symbols are offensive to some Native Americans — is trivial.
We don’t endorse mascots that demean, belittle or stereotype Indians.
So far as we can tell, none of the 15 schools intends to do so. Which is hardly surprising — mascots, after all, are sources of school and community pride, not ridicule.
The more compelling argument against a statewide ban, though, comes not from the schools, but from tribal members.
Steve Bobb Sr., a member of the Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde in Western Oregon, said his tribe doesn’t oppose using Native American names or symbols in schools that “hold their mascots in a very high regard.”
Which is precisely where every high school we know of holds its mascot.
We don’t much care that President Obama has publicly expressed his support for gay marriage. Or that Mitt Romney has publicly denounced it.
Our response to Obama’s announcement last week is tepid because the issue of gay marriage, though a contentious social issue and one worthy of respectful debate, is neither vital to the nation’s future nor a matter under Obama’s (or Romney’s) bailiwick.
Whether same-sex couples can legally marry is a question rightfully reserved for the voters in each state.
The dysfunctional Baker School Board has compounded one recent mistake — censuring director Kyle Knight — by making another.
And this latest blunder could affect all of us, by compromising the public’s ability to keep tabs on its elected officials.
Moreover, this new mistake is based on illogical reasoning, about which more later.
On Tuesday a majority of the five-member board — chair Lynne Burroughs and directors Mark Henderson and Andrew Bryan — didn’t object when Dan Van Thiel, a local attorney who does legal work for the school district, recommended a policy that eviscerates the spirit of Oregon’s public meetings law.
We applaud the Baker City Council for making street maintenance a high priority for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
But the proposed street user fee that councilors discussed Tuesday (no action was taken) — $5 per month for homeowners, $10 per month for businesses — would be too heavy of a burden on too many city residents.
That fee would bring add an estimated $250,000 per year to the city’s street-maintenance budget. Those dollars could be put to good use. City officials say it would take at least twice that much new money each year to reverse the decade-long downward trend in the condition of city streets.
But in a city with a significant number of residents living on Social Security or other fixed sources of income, an extra $5 per month can be painful.
We suggest a more moderate fee — say $2 per month for everyone — which could be increased by modest increments in the future. That would help smooth the streets without making for too bumpy of a financial ride for residents.
By Baker City Herald Editorial Board
So much for the old adage about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer.
A quartet of environmental groups thinks it’s unseemly, and maybe worse, for officials from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to even be seen in public with people who don’t much like the gray wolves that that agency is responsible for managing in Northeastern Oregon.
Cutting back on National Guard helicopter flights designed to find marijuana-growing sites, in order to save a pittance in the federal budget, is a bad bargain for Baker County.
We hope Congress fixes that flaw in President Obama’s proposed budget for the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.
So long as marijuana is illegal, there will be great temptation for people to grow it in remote areas.
Which pretty much describes quite a lot of Baker County — including the million acres (half the county’s area) of public land.
These isolated plantations pose considerable danger to hikers, hunters, ATV riders and others.
The potential threats include chemicals, booby traps and gun-toting “guards.”
Fortunately, U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., advocates for continuing the interdiction flights.
Ideally such flights wouldn’t be necessary. But until that ideal becomes reality, the public who pay the federal government’s bills deserve the protection that regular surveillance flights provides.
Baker City Herald Editorial Board
We hope a recent comment from retired U.S. District Judge James Redden isn’t indicative of the level of consideration he gave to the question of salmon conservation while he was on the bench in Portland.
We’ve noticed a curious lack of consistency in how Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber employs his bully pulpit.
Or, in this case, bully word-processing program.
On Wednesday the governor sent a letter to several federal officials urging them to undertake a multi-year (and no doubt, multimillion-dollar) study of the possible effects of transporting coal from Montana and Wyoming to ports in Oregon and Washington.
This coal would be shipped across the Pacific Ocean to Asia where several countries — China, of course, among them — would burn the coal to produce electricity to run their burgeoning economies.
(Yes, some countries actually have such things.)
To be sure, Kitzhaber’s concerns are not the ravings of a Chicken Little.
We’re no prudes, but our skepticism is aroused whenever someone insists that getting naked was necessary to make a political point.
The most convincing arguments can be delivered at least as effectively, we’d wager, by a person who is clothed.
Nudity, you’ve no doubt noticed, tends to distract people, and thus detract from the position being advanced.
All of which is to say we think the statement John Brennan, the Portland man who shed his clothes recently at Portland International Airport, was trying to make was as blurry as the videos of his antics broadcast on TV.
Brennan, who was annoyed at being detained by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents, described the U.S. airport security system as “broken.”
It’s annoying, to be sure. So is waiting in line at Disneyland. But you don’t often hear about people stripping at the entrance to Space Mountain.
Until terrorists start wearing T-shirts announcing their intentions, we’re willing to endure brief interludes with zealous TSA drones. It beats crashing or getting blown up.