We sympathize with Baker City councilors as they grapple with a
pending $2.5 million tab to further cleanse the city’s drinking water,
which is already admirably pure.
But we urge councilors to be judicious in expressing their concerns
about the federal rule designed to protect people from cryptosporidium
and other microscopic parasites that can make people sick and, in rare
cases, kill them.
We’re not suggesting councilors muzzle themselves.
In fact we encourage them to interrogate government officials about
the rules. We’re particularly interested in the possibility, as City
Manager Mike Kee told councilors last week, that the current rules
could change before the city’s October 2016 deadline to deal with
That said, councilors would do their constituents a disservice if,
as Councilor Clair Button warned last week, the city incurs a fine or
other penalty because it misses a key deadline.
We don’t think that’s likely. The city has plenty of time before it
totally commits to buying equipment that will subject our drinking
water to a disinfecting dose of ultraviolet light.
The federal government has shown a curious inconsistency in its concern for wildlife over the past quarter century or so.
Early in that period, the plight of the spotted owl was deemed so dire that, by way of a federal judge’s ruling and the subsequent policies of several federal agencies, it was decided that only a drastic curtailment of logging on public lands could fix the problem.
The Baker School District seems to have learned a lesson about having classes on legal holidays.
We understand why the school board decided, last April, to make Monday, Jan. 2 a regular school day even though, as a result of New Year’s Day falling on a Sunday, Jan. 1 was the legal holiday.
This is the district’s first school year with a four-day week. Having classes on one legal holiday gives the district a little more flexibility in meeting its required number of school days.
What officials perhaps didn’t fully account for, though, is the ubiquity of technology.
The Bureau of Land Management’s strategy for managing 428,000 acres in the region, most of them in Baker County, was conceived during the Reagan Administration.
BLM figures it’s time for a fresh outlook. This is appropriate, considering events that have transpired in the past quarter century which directly affect how BLM deals with the vast swathes of public ground for which it’s responsible.
Protecting sage grouse habitat, and a heightened interest in how livestock grazing and motor vehicles affect flora and fauna, are but a few examples.
We reacted to the public service announcement aired on a local radio station with a sensation approaching horror.
Just 33 percent of Baker County “has access to healthy food,” the announcer informs listeners.
The spot concludes with what’s obviously supposed to sound like the voice of a pitiful child who says, in a plaintive tone, “Mom, I’m hungry.”
It is indeed a troubling notion, that two-thirds of us in Baker County — about 10,800 people — can’t get healthy food.
But then we consulted the source of that statistic.
And so we bid farewell to 2011.
It was an eventful year — earthquakes, tsunami, debt ceiling debate
— but we expect 2011 might seem placid compared with the inevitable
spectacle of the presidential campaign.
The economy failed to rouse itself as we had hoped.
But there were positive trends, too. It was a good year, generally
speaking, for the agriculture industry, a mainstay of Baker County’s
Vermont has gotten our attention.
And it has nothing to do with maple syrup.
Or ice cream.
We’re curious, rather, about that state’s attempt to show that universal health care is attainable in the U.S.
A group visited Baker City last week to promote Vermont’s first-of-its-kind program.
Their enthusiasm, though palpable, doesn’t answer the key question:
How to pay for supplying health insurance to people who don’t have it
Apparently Vermont is still working on its answer.
Lean times, these past few years.
But not for everyone.
Oregon state government, for instance, in what seems to us a contradiction of its incessant claims of financial trouble, barely trimmed its spending in areas that could hardly be described as essential.
Unless, of course, you consider it essential that the state pay for employees to attend meetings and conferences in places such as Salishan, Sunriver and, in one case, Gibraltar.
The case of Baker City’s newest cell phone tower raises an interesting conundrum for City Hall.
But the episode also gives the city a chance to possibly mend fences with some residents, and avoid controversies.
Last winter T-Mobile applied for a conditional-use permit to install a 50-foot tower and a 220-square-foot building on Spring Garden Hill.
The only trouble with a bequeathed gift is that you can’t personally thank the giver.
A pity, because we’d like to shake Anthony Silvers’ hand and tell him how much we appreciate what he’s done for Baker City.