We expect Oregon’s congressional delegation to bicker occasionally.
But we figured there was universal agreement among them about the federal county payments program.
We are so naive.
County payments, which Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden helped create in 2000,
are supposed to help counties, including Baker, that lost hundreds of
thousands of dollars yearly when the amount of logging on federal land
plummeted starting in the early 1990s.
So Oregon congressman Peter DeFazio thinks random checks of airline passengers’ carry-on bags are “really stupid.”
Well, we’ll take really stupid over a hijacking every time.
Fortunately, we haven’t had one of those in this country for 7ﬁ years.
The interesting thing here is that DeFazio, a 12-term Democrat from
Springfield whose district covers most of Oregon’s southwest quarter,
told the (Eugene) Register-Guard newspaper that he considers himself an
expert on airport security.
There’s scarcely a better way for the Oregon Legislature to scare
farmers and ranchers than to debate bills that mention water rights.
People in the ag business pay particular attention to such legislation.
Their scrutiny isn’t prompted by paranoia, either.
It’s awfully hard, after all, to run a farm or ranch without an ample supply of water.
For most producers in Baker County some of that water — most of it, in many cases — comes from rivers and streams.
Jobs are scarce in most places these days, but Baker County soon will have four pretty good ones available.
All are with the county’s road department.
In a confluence of retirements rare for the sheer durations
involved, four road department workers either have retired, or intend
to do so by May 28.
Quite a lot has changed since 1964, even if you don’t account for the Beatles, the moon landing and the Internet.
Yet after four and a half decades, by one measure not so much as a
tree has fallen nor a patch of sagebrush been scorched in Baker County.
This oversight is to be rectified finally.
The measure in question is how the Oregon Department of Forestry
defines which private lands in Baker County are forested and which are
Even while they fret about the state having too little money, some
Oregon legislators envision a time when the state will have more than
That’s optimism, we suppose.
But this is not the proper time for lawmakers to propose a bill that
would ensure Oregon residents and businesses would keep less of the
money they earn once the economy rebounds.
The legislation is Senate Joint Resolution 29. It was introduced last week.
The bill’s target is Oregon’s famous income tax “kicker” refund system.
The recession has spurred state lawmakers to new levels of creativity in their quest for money.
Among the more shortsighted of the ideas is Senate Bill 440.
The bill would overturn a 2003 state law that mandates that
government agencies spend at least 70 percent of money they collect
from lodging taxes to promote tourism.
SB 440 would allow cities and counties to spend lodging taxes any way they see fit.
That’s appropriate for, say, property taxes.
Baker County residents won’t go it alone in their campaign to convince Idaho Power Co. to build a power line somewhere else.
State Sen. Ted Ferrioli, the John Day Republican who represents
Baker County, introduced a bill that would prevent Idaho Power from
constructing the proposed 500-kilovolt transmission line on the
company’s preferred route through Baker and Malheur counties.
Baker City’s ordinance regulating business signs dates to 1921.
What surprises us most about this fact is not that four generations of city councils haven’t tinkered much with the rules.
Rather, we were shocked to hear the city had a sign ordinance in place just three years after World War I ended.
|<< Start < Previous page 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Next page > End >>|
|Results 751 - 765 of 1314|