We favor any reasonable effort to give Baker County officials, and
their constituents, a louder voice in the discussion about how to
manage the public lands that make up half of our county’s 2 million
And so we were intrigued by the presentation that Nampa attorney Fred Kelly Grant made last week in Baker City.
Grant encourages county officials to write a “coordination plan.”
(Baker County has not done so). Those plans lay out what’s important to
the county — a steady supply of timber from national forests, for
instance, or public land grazing permits for local ranchers.
Federal law requires the Forest Service and BLM to strive to manage public lands in a manner consistent with county plans.
Somebody needs to remind Oregon’s Legislature that wolves have come to the state, and apparently they’re staying.
We understand that lawmakers have bigger problems to deal with — a
budget shortfall that could exceed $2 billion over the next 2ﬁ years,
But Oregon’s wolves are real, too. And the animals have proved, in
Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, that they’re not averse to snacking on
calves and lambs.
Unfortunately, the Legislature has yet to make the changes in state law
needed to ensure that provisions in Oregon’s wolf management plan that
are vital to ranchers can take effect.
The budget news from Salem is bad, and getting worse.
But what worries us as much as the ever-increasing estimate of the
state’s budget shortfall is what seems to be a reluctance among
lawmakers and elected officials to make the hard choices that managers
of private companies have had to make for months now.
That is, to lay off workers.
State officials say Oregon’s budget deficit, by the end of the fiscal
year June 30, could total from $650 million to as much as $1 billion.
Yet according to his spokesperson, Gov. Ted Kulongoski will not try to trim the state’s 45,000-employee payroll.
Contrast the governor’s response with what’s been happening in the private sector in Oregon and nationwide.
Almost every day since late summer another company has announced that
it was cutting hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of jobs.
Barack Obama, as most of the world knows, took a historic oath today and became the 44th president of the United States.
Neither Bill Tebeau nor Bruce Klunder is anything close to as widely known and revered as is Obama.
Yet Tebeau and Klunder — Baker boys, both of them — each contributed
something significant to the crusade for true equality in American, a
quest for which President Obama’s inauguration is, in a sense, the
Tebeau, who is 83, graduated from Baker High School in 1943.
Tebeau wanted to be an engineer, so he went west, to Oregon State College (now University) in Corvallis.
He had been accepted to the school, which then, as now, was renowned for its engineering program.
For anyone who wondered why airline pilots make more money than most of
us, the answer splashed down into the Hudson River between Manhattan
and New Jersey on Thursday afternoon.
The dilemma that confronted US Airways pilot Chesley B. “Sully” Sullenberger III is one few of us can comprehend.
Less than one minute after Sullenberger guided the Airbus A320 jet into
the sky, with 154 passengers and crew members aboard, he radioed to
LaGuardia Airport that the plane had struck a flock of birds and that
both of the plane’s engines were disabled.
For a pilot, altitude is time. Sullenberger had very little of either.
And with both engines ailing, he also lacked options.
Oregon’s law banning 16- and 17-year-olds from using cell phones while they’re driving sounds tougher than it has actually been.
Since the law took effect last year, police officers have written just
a handful of tickets for the violation, according to The Associated
In Portland, the state’s biggest city, officers haven’t handed out a single ticket for the cell phone offense.
Police officials point out that the cell phone ban is a “secondary”
violation rather than a “primary” one. That means an officer can’t stop
a teen driver just because the officer sees the driver holding a cell
President-elect Obama’s pledge to spend close to a trillion of
taxpayers’ dollars has, predictably, elicited plenty of suggestions
about what to do with the money.
Obama hopes to revive the economy and create a couple million jobs.
Those are worthwhile goals, although we’re not convinced the latter, in particular, is realistic.
Rebuilding highways, replacing bridges and the like would prompt construction companies to hire workers.
But once the asphalt’s put down, the job’s done. Without a continued
infusion of tax dollars — and even the biggest economy in the world
can’t afford a trillion-dollar stimulus package every few months — many
of the new jobs likely will be temporary.
The public deserves to know how many of its tax dollars Mountain Valley
Mental Health has spent to defend itself in a lawsuit that two former
Baker County Commissioners, who approved the contract with Mountain
Valley to provide mental health services here, should require the
nonprofit company to say how much it has doled out for the lawsuit.
Mountain Valley’s continuing silence on the matter spurs speculation
about the cost. And that speculation — especially about the possibility
that attorney fees are diverting money from patients who depend on
Mountain Valley — exacerbates the dissension between the agency and its
Oregon’s health officials claim on a state Web site that complying with
the new law banning smoking in bars is, and here we quote: “easy.”
After perusing the Web site we weren’t convinced this is so.
Adhering to certain parts of the law, we’ll concede, shouldn’t severely tax tavern owners.
Putting up some “no smoking” signs and hiding the ash trays, for instance, is pretty light work.
But there’s one “easy” task listed on the Department of Human
Services’s Smokefree Workplace Law Web site which, it seems to us,
could cause quite a hassle for pub owners.
Under the heading “complying with the law is easy” is this: “encourage employees who smoke to quit smoking.”
The state suggests one way by which business owners can accomplish
this: “Encourage (employees who smoke) to call Oregon's toll-free QUIT
LINE at 800-QUIT-NOW (800-784-8669).
The (La Grande) Observer:
It’s a funny thing about environmental groups. The more they claim to
do for forest health, the unhealthier the forests become. Lawsuits and
appeals of timber projects and sales go on and on, while trees die and
go unharvested, while combustibles continue to pile up on the forest
Legal wrestling matches drag on (and on), and conflagrations break out
every year. The result? Blighted land, squandered taxpayer dollars and
a wasted resource.
The controversy touched a new height in absurdity recently, when a
federal district court judge effectively slapped down a U.S. Forest
Service policy designed to promote work that reduces the risk of
wildfires. Two local sales already evaluated for positive and negative
environmental impacts were stopped dead in their tracks.
The Forest Service policy, adopted in 2003, exempts from appeal certain
logging projects on 1,000 acres or fewer, and also prescribed burning
on 4,500 or fewer acres. The policy is designed to allow some
constructive, productive work to proceed in a timely manner.