>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Paying for a cat fix

Print

Paying for a cat fix


We agree with Suzanne Fouty that there are too many feral or otherwise unwanted cats in Baker City.

We also agree with Fouty, who coordinates the Mollie Atwater and Friends Spay/Neuter Program, that an infusion of cash to deal with the problem would improve our quality of life.

But we think there might be a way to achieve that goal without requiring residents to help pay for a project some of them might oppose.

The proposal Fouty presented to the City Council Tuesday calls for the city to add a surcharge of 50 cents per month to all customers’ water/sewer bills.

That would raise an estimated $24,000. Fouty suggests using the money not only to augment the existing effort to spay and neuter feral cats and help pet owners pay to neuter their cats and dogs, but also to hire a part-time coordinator who, Fouty hopes, could leverage the city dollars into substantial grants.

The City Council’s reaction was less than universally enthusiastic.

We’re not surprised.

The issue isn’t solely, or perhaps even primarily, financial. Six dollars per year, after all, is no financial burden for even the tightest budget.

But some people bristle at being required to contribute to something they might not care about, or feel benefits them. And elected city councilors are naturally reluctant, in many cases, to impose new fees, however modest, on their constituents.

We don’t, though, think the city should simply turn Fouty away.

We suggest instead that the city add to water/sewer bills an option by which residents can donate to the spay/neuter project. We’re thinking here of a check-off box similar to the ones on income tax forms where you can contribute to the presidential election campaign fund.

We understand that voluntary donations are a crucial source of money for the spay/neuter fund now, and that the advantage of Fouty’s idea is that it’s a reliable revenue stream that doesn’t depend on individuals’ generosity.

But we believe that soliciting donations through water/sewer bills could reach residents who don’t know about the spay/neuter efforts. And it’s likely that voluntary donations would be, on average, larger than the $6 per year the city would collect with the 50-cents-per-month surcharge. Ideally, an appeal to generosity would raise more money than a required surcharge.

Print

blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use