>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald Newsstand

Read digital interactive editions of our publications

Read Today's Edition Take A Tour
View All Publications

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Questions for the county


Questions for the county

We have a couple of simple questions for Baker County’s three commissioners — questions they need to answer should they decide later this month to accept the gift of Anthony Lakes ski area.

Question 1: Based on the current owners’ 12 years of records, how many skier visits would the county need to break even?

Question 2: In how many of those 12 years did Anthony Lakes attract at least that many skiers?

The answers could go far in persuading skeptical residents that the county, by taking over the ski area, would not be risking any of their tax dollars.

That risk looks to us to be relatively low.

Although the trio of couples who own Anthony Lakes say they’ve never made a profit, they concede that the county might be able to trim operating expenses by assigning certain tasks, such as bookkeeping and marketing, to employees or contractors who are already on the county’s payroll.

As an example, the county recently hired contractor Tim Bishop to market the county’s attractions. Bishop said he’s embarked on a crash course of sorts to learn how best to lure skiers.

Ultimately, it seems likely that the worst-case scenario in this deal is that the county, to ensure its taxpayers are protected, would be forced to admit defeat and close Anthony Lakes.

But even then the county, or the nonprofit corporation to which the county could hand the reins, would have debt-free assets with a market value of $1.2 million, according to the Union County Assessor. (The lodge, chairlift and other structures are just across the county border, which means Baker County wouldn’t lose any property taxes if it takes over the resort. The resort pays Union County about $4,400 per year.)

We support the county in trying to save an important attraction, one that benefits many local businesses during a season when tourism slacks.

The ideal outcome is that Baker County, unlike the current owners, finds a private buyer, and soon. But until then, taxpayers deserve assurance from the county that it will at least break even on the venture.


blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2016 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use