Home Opinion Editorials Time to ponder park plan
Time to ponder park plan
We agree with the Baker City Council’s decision Tuesday to wait until it has some specific proposals before choosing whether to return a generous gift.
But we also understand Councilors Roger Coles’ and Beverly Calder’s concerns about the potential expense to the city of keeping the residential property that Anthony Silvers, who died last year, bequeathed.
That property is on Clifford Street, just east of the Powder River between Valley and Washington avenues. There are two homes on the property.
As a condition of the gift, Silvers required the city, within five years, to use the property “for public use and benefit” of the city. Otherwise, the property reverts to Silvers’ sister, Ernestine Hill.
A reasonable request, to be sure. But complying with it might prove difficult, and expensive.
The highest use for the property is likely as a park.
But to build one the city probably would have to tear down the two houses, those not being typical features of a public park.
Then, too, a handful of residents in that neighborhood told the City Council Tuesday that they fear the addition of a park would exacerbate the problems — including alleged drug use and loud music — that emanate from the city’s year-old Central Park on the opposite bank of the river.
That’s a legitimate concern.
But we think Calder was on to something when she said Tuesday that over time Central Park is apt to attract more families. The absence of amenities — no playground equipment, for instance — makes the park a tough sell for parents with kids.
Once the city addresses that issue — and secures some off-street parking — the idea of building a bridge to the Silvers property and using it as sort of a Central Park annex might be more palatable to neighbors.
How the city would pay for all this, of course, is an open question. The city has no surplus dollars for park improvements.
But we recall that the city spent $200,000 for the property that became Central Park. At least the Silvers property was free.
And with Silvers’ deadline more than four years away, there’s ample time for city officials to figure out whether they can make good use of this gift.