>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Yes on Measure 71

Yes on Measure 71


Oftentimes Oregon’s prescription for its frequent legislative crises is to let them simmer a good while.

This strategy works well enough with, say, a pot of beef stew.

But it’s no solution to a multi-billion-dollar budget mess.

That’s why we urge voters to approve Measure 71 on the Nov. 2 ballot.

Measure 71 would bring into the modern age the state’s antiquated system, which requires the Legislature meet only in odd-numbered years.

If Measure 71 passes, lawmakers would convene in Salem every year.

Just like 45 other states already do.

 

No longer would legislators need to haggle over the need for a special session when problems arise during even-numbered years.

2010, for instance.

Some Republican lawmakers urged their Democratic colleagues, who control the Legislature, to call a special session this summer to try to deal with the escalating budget deficit.

It didn’t happen.

And even when it does happen — the Legislature has had eight special sessions since 1999 — the crisis atmosphere is not conducive to forging solutions.

The other thing we like about Measure 71 is that it sets limits on how long lawmakers can linger in Salem.

Under the current system, the Legislature can stay in session as long as it wants to. Some sessions have lasted longer than seven months.

Measure 71, though, frees lawmakers from the pressure of trying to get everything done in a single session — an understandable pressure, since legislators know they probably won’t convene again for more than a year.

The measure would limit sessions in odd-numbered years to 160 calendar days Sessions in even-numbered years would be limited to 35 days. The Legislature could lengthen any session, but only if at least two-thirds of senators and representatives agree to do so.

Cynics would say they’d rather lawmakers spend as little time as possible in Salem, the notion being that if they’re not in session they can’t spend our money or pass punitive regulations.

But the reality is that we elected these people to deal with big dilemmas.

And it’s pretty hard to do that when you don’t get together but once every couple of years.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use