>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters to the Editor for July 29, 2011

Print

Letters to the Editor for July 29, 2011


Government insurance is efficient
To the editor:
In a recent letter to the editor, Pete Sundin accuses promoters of a single-payer health care system of having a “child-like faith” that government can provide health care efficiently. After all, didn’t the Defense Department years ago pay $200 for a toilet seat and $500 for a hammer?
Citing those two examples is, of course, not the whole truth. As Paul Harvey would say, “Now for the rest of the story”:
Steve Kelman, Harvard professor and former administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement, did a study to determine who gets the best price for off-the-shelf products like computers: Fortune 500 companies or government? The study concluded that “overall the government does quite well.”
Also, Sundin leaves out another part of the story. The U.S. already has a single-payer health care system. It’s called Medicare. 
And Americans love their super-efficient Medicare system, which spends only 3 percent to 4 percent of its budget processing claims, whereas corporate insurance companies spend 20 percent to 30 percent of our premium dollars for advertising and profits in addition to processing claims.  
Inefficiency in the corporate health care system is what Sundin should be comparing to the Defense Department’s notorious $500 hammer.
Gary Dielman
Baker City


Medicare, Social Security work quite well for me
To the editor:
Just read Mr. Sundin’s letter in the most recent Herald. I have no idea how old you are Mr. Sundin but I have one word for you, Medicare. It is the most efficient program the feds run. It provides medical care to those of us over 65 and it does it without waste or fraud. Nonetheless, I prefer its effectiveness over the private insurance I carry. I have found that Social Security works well also.
Iva Mace
Baker City
Let property owners do one-time meter reads
To the editor:
Time is money. Time is a valuable commodity.
The Baker City employees are well-trained and highly skilled. They are compensated justly for their skills.
Why are we using city employees to read unscheduled meter reads? It’s a waste of time and dollars.
An unscheduled meter read is a one-off read. A one-off read may be done for a move in, move out, escrow or house sale.
For over 20 years the city of Seattle has allowed property owners, managers and tenants to read their own meters for these one-off reads. The online service has been available for over 10 years. It is easy to use and convenient.
By shifting the burden of the meter reads to property owners, managers and tenants, city employees won’t have their work schedules disrupted, creating costly delays to its customers.
Paul Dunkak
Baker City
Print

blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use