Worried about carbon dioxide? There was more in the past
This letter is in response to Marshall McComb’s letter to the editor on global warming. I agree with Marshall to a point we have come a long way in controlling pollution. Our pollution expertise 50 years ago was leading the charge on polluting our planet. That is until the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act which stopped this insane practice of spewing nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide and other polluting gases that hung over the cities like a fog.
But it seems now it is fossil fuel, oil and natural gas that contribute to carbon dioxide gas. We as humans contribute by the air we inhale and remove the oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. The trees and the vegetation love us because they need it to survive and thrive, and they give out oxygen so that we may survive and thrive also. Al Gore’s thinking on global warming could be self-serving because Al owns businesses building green energy equipment.
The Marshalls of the world want us to quit using carbon polluting oil and natural gas to cut down on the nasty old carbon dioxide. But even Marshall is a loss for words when you mention the volcanic fire chain in the South Pacific erupting several hundred times a year spewing out tons of carbon dioxide. Just the eruption in Iceland alone wiped out all of the Al Gore and Marshall McComb’s hard work and put more carbon dioxide in the air than we have since we started cutting back on carbon dioxide, that isn’t even counting the hundreds of eruptions a year. Not only that when a forest or even a grass fire burns it gives up to the atmosphere all of the carbon dioxide it has consumed in its entire lifetime.
Back when Oregon was just an inland sea, volcanic eruptions, lava flows and mountain building were prevalent in Oregon. So much so the carbon dioxide levels were so high that it super saturated the inland see with carbon dioxide. This super saturation settled to the sea bottom and contributed to the limestone deposits that Ash Grove is mining today that are thousands of feet thick. I deal with fact and quit drinking Kool Aid and believing in fairy stories when I was a kid.
Forest Service doesn’t manage land; it restricts public access
On June 3, Tom Montoya, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, submitted a community editorial lauding the USFS and its efforts to implement the Blue Mountains Forest Plan. He announced the best way to “re-engage” the community, the stakeholders and the USFS. He advocates public meetings, which will provide “opportunities to discuss and develop ideas that will help us to improve the final Revised Forest Plans, and provide clarity on our final decisions.”
If my memory serves me, the comment period is over. Why have “marathon” meetings when the general public has to attend, unpaid, while USFS officials naturally get compensated?
We have been going through this process or similar processes since 2009. Let’s review what has happened. At least five forest supervisors have come and gone, none could get the “plan” right. The citizens have commented, studies have been done, and maps have been tendered, and what is the result? The citizens’ ideas and input have been largely ignored. The USFS seems to receive input and then largely, in my opinion, just make an arbitrary decision.
Why doesn’t the USFS spend the money that they allocate to the Forest Plan to managing the forest? I speak from experience. I own land totally surrounded by the national forest. I have seen no forest management for the last 25 years. No thinning, no weed control, no serious logging. The forest is overgrown.
The question is, since no or very little forest management is taking place, where is the money going and why is the USFS trying to jam a plan down our throats that largely restricts any reasonable uses on the national forest? I see the way that they will implement their plan will be to use the Travel Management Plan to totally restrict and limit almost all vehicular use.
Years ago, the Wallowa-Whitman had a motto of “land of many uses.” Today an adept motto would be the “land of no access and no uses.”
Leave the roads and trails alone. We have enough wilderness and non-accessible land already. In the “Discover Your Forest” advertisements, the USFS encourages youth to go to the forest. Could be a little difficult with no or very limited road and trail access, couldn’t it?
Allan R. Chase