>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Prisons don't prevent crimes


Prisons don't prevent crimes

To the editor:

The Herald should do its homework before blindly supporting expensive feel-good legislation.

In your Feb. 12 editorial "No more freebies," you support Kevin Mannix's Initiative 40, which mandates minimum sentences of 14 to 36 months for a host of drug and property crimes. You want to "discourage" crime and, apparently, are willing to do so no matter the cost to taxpayers. You conveniently leave out the shocking $400,000,000 price tag.

Neither you nor Mannix on his Web site offers any evidence that Initiative 40 will result in reducing crime rates. If you had done a few minutes Googling, you would have found that study after study shows reduction in crime is not attributable to mandatory minimum sentences.

Take, for example, Oregon's Measure 11, the mandatory minimum sentencing law for violent crimes approved in 1994. After Measure 11 took effect, prison population grew from 7,539 to 13,401 inmates by 2007.

A study of Oregon's crime and incarceration rates commissioned by Western Prison Project found during the decade following passage of Measure 11, violent crime rates in Oregon did fall. But ... so did violent crimes rates across the nation, even in those states that did not embark, as did Oregon, on hugely expensive prison construction projects. The study concluded, "There appears to be no direct relationship between incarceration rates and crime rates."

The best example is comparison of Oregon and New York, a state which built no new prisons. Between 1995 and 2002, Oregon's incarceration rate jumped by 66.2 percent, while New York's incarceration rate fell by 8.4 percent. Yet both experienced nearly equal reductions in violent crime.

With a little more research, the Herald would have found that studies show much, much more bang for the buck in crime reduction is achieved with money spent on rehabilitation programs. Unfortunately while Oregon was spending millions and millions building new prisons, alcohol and drug addiction treatment programs had their funding drastically reduced.

It feels good to lock up criminals. But it is penny wise and pound foolish to spend the money on ineffective mandatory minimum sentences rather than on proven rehabilitation programs.

Gary Dielman

Baker City


blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2015 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use