>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news Yellow Pages NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Stop the selective persecution

Stop the selective persecution

To the editor:

It seems that City Manager Brocato and Mayor Petry can't be content to fritter away the budget surplus by recruiting expensive "rock stars," giving extravagant and unwarranted raises to favored city staff, or by improving the airport playground for people who are wealthy like them. Now, in my humble opinion, they seem to want to amuse themselves by bullying Councilor Calder out of public service with a campaign of spurious charges, mean-spirited public statements and threats of censure.

Friday's article in the Herald didn't put the bogus charges in the context of the ordinance, so it would be easy for the public to get an inaccurate picture of what is occurring, especially in light of the inane quotes from Brocato and Petry.

Ordinance: "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A COMPREHENSIVE REVISION OF CITY REGULATIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS; etc." A quick reading reveals that it is about regulating pedestrian and vehicle traffic, as well as parking. It has nothing to do with controlling what someone poster paints on the sidewalk in front of their business during one of our city's summer festivities.

The Mayor and City Manager are making a really lame attempt to charge her with violating an ordinance that has nothing to do with the "crime" she was supposed to have committed. This isn't the first time the City has done this. According to city e-mail from Brocato to Petry and others:

"Councilor Calder in my tenure as city manager, has violated the law regarding sidewalks on three occasions."

None of this is true, according to Calder and common sense. It would seem to be a serious distortion of the truth on Brocato's part, because Calder says she actually WON the case in court! Aye Yi Yi.... The other two cases involve painting for festivities, for which the ordinance also does not apply.

There is a selective prosecution aspect to this, as not only is the ordinance not applicable to Calder's "dots," but it IS applicable to a sign in front of Councilor Dorrah's business on Campbell Street (York's).

See http://bakercountyblog.blogspot.com/

It's really worse than we know.

Christopher Christie

Baker City

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2010 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

bakercityherald.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari

Generated in 0.52682 Seconds