>Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow BakerCityHerald.com

Baker City Herald print edition

view all Baker City Herald print publications »

The Baker City Herald is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow News arrow Local News arrow Judge agrees on Brocato rulings

Judge agrees on Brocato rulings


By CHRIS COLLINS

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed all but one of the issues raised in a multi-million dollar lawsuit filed by Steve Brocato after he was fired from his job as Baker City manager in June 2009.

Brocato filed the lawsuit in May 2010 against the city and four City Council members Dennis Dorrah, Beverly Calder, Aletha Bonebrake and Clair Button, and Baker City resident Gary Dielman.

U.S. District Court Judge Michael W. Mosman wrote in an opinion and order issued Friday that he would adopt the findings and recommendations of Federal Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan as his own.

Sullivan issued her recommendations in January and they were then reviewed by Mosman before he issued his opinion Friday.

Mosman and Sullivan both denied the city and councilors’ motions for summary judgment on Brocato’s “deprivation of liberty” claim. Brocato alleges the four council members made false statements against him, which made it difficult for him to find another job. He also contends that the city did not give him a “name-clearing hearing,” which he says he was entitled to.

Sullivan wrote in her recommendations that those issues are matters for a jury to consider.

Mosman granted summary judgment to Dielman, dismissing all claims Brocato had made against him.

Mosman also ruled in favor of the council members and the city on all other issues raised in the lawsuit,  dismissing Brocato’s claims that he was fired while acting as a whistleblower protected by state law and that the city and council members intentionally inflicted emotional distress on Brocato, that he was wrongfully discharged, that they intentionally interfered with his economic relations, that they defamed him and placed him in a false light and conspired against him.

Mosman noted in his ruling that the city and the councilors raised several objections to Sullivan’s recommendation that he deny their motion for summary judgment regarding the “deprivation of liberty interest.”

Brocato also raised objections to Sullivan’s recommendations. He maintained that she erred in her findings that his whistleblower claim should be dismissed because he was not serving an “important public duty.”

Brocato alleges that the council was angry and fired him after he sought an opinion from the Oregon Government Ethics Commission in April 2009 regarding a possible conflict of interest over a proposed property maintenance ordinance. In May 2009, Brocato asked the city’s community service officer to inspect each councilor’s property to determine if any would be affected by changes to the ordinance.

Brocato also objected to Sullivan’s findings that the “Councilors’ defamatory statements about Brocato were made in the course and scope of their employment.”

“Councilors were serving on the City Council and addressed matters that were directly related to their positions as Councilors,” Sullivan wrote as part of her 27-page findings and recommendations issued in January.

Councilors are protected from liability by the Oregon Tort Claims Act, she wrote.

Brocato also objected to Sullivan’s finding that Dielman’s criticism of him in letters to the editor and in emails sent to Jennifer Watkins, former assistant city manager, were opinion and as such are protected by the First Amendment.

“I have reviewed the briefings and the record and find the parties’ objections unpersuasive,” Mosman wrote in his opinion and order, adding that he agreed with Sullivan’s recommendation.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Features
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Commenting Policy / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Follow Baker City Herald headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use