The opening two sentences of Measure 58 read like the introduction to a rousing political speech.
“English is the language of opportunity in America. Learning English opens doors to better jobs and opportunities.”
It’s pretty hard to argue with those statements.
Unfortunately, Measure 58 rapidly devolves from there.
Although we think Measure 58’s apparent goal is laudable — to help
Oregon public school students who aren’t native English speakers become
fluent as soon as possible — the way in which the measure seeks to
achieve that goal is terribly misguided.
A solid majority of Oregon’s public school teachers, we feel confident in asserting, are dedicated people who do a good job.
But teachers, even the successful ones, are not clones.
Some teachers are just plain better at their job than others.
This hardly makes teaching unique among professions, of course.
Not every lawyer, after all, can deliver an eloquent closing argument.
But as we know, the silver-tongued attorneys command bigger fees than
their colleagues who tend to get tongue-tied in front of jury or judge.
We think teachers ought to be treated the same way.
The best teachers should earn more money, and have more job security, than the merely adequate teachers.
That’s the basic idea behind Measure 60, and we urge voters to support the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot.
Unfortunately, Measure 60 has been tarnished by the reputation of one of its chief petitioners, Bill Sizemore.
Although neither of Baker County’s representatives in the Oregon Legislature has an opponent in the Nov. 4 election, we urge voters to remember to cast their ballots for Sen. Ted Ferrioli and Rep. Cliff Bentz.
Both are strong advocates for issues vital to Baker County, including preserving water rights for farmers and ranchers, promoting renewable energy, and managing public forests both to produce timber and to reduce the risk of wildfire.
Both Bentz and Ferrioli also are Republicans who supply at least a little balance in the Legislature, in which Democrats hold majorities in both houses.
We count on Ferrioli and Bentz to remind their colleagues about what’s important on this side of the state.
When it comes to dealing with people who sell meth, heroin, cocaine or
ecstasy, what we care about most is making sure those people can’t
continue to commit crimes.
Same with people who break into houses to steal someone’s possessions.
Or their actual identity.
Merely hoping that such people will forego the criminal life is a nice sentiment, and a worthwhile goal to pursue.
But hoping isn’t a sure enough solution for us.
That’s why we urge Oregonians to vote yes on Measure 61, and no on Measure 57.
Those are the two anti-crime measures competing for votes in the Nov. 4 election.
Tim Kerns has earned another four years as a Baker County commissioner.
Kerns and his colleagues, chairman Fred Warner Jr. and commissioner
Carl Stiff, have in general done a good job overseeing county
operations the past few years and we don’t believe there’s a compelling
reason to tinker with that formula.
Kerns’ greatest asset is his advocacy for issues vital to Baker County’s economy.
In particular, Kerns’ expertise in his own profession — farming — is
valuable in a county where agriculture is the biggest sector of the
Kerns, a Republican who has served as a county commissioner since 2001,
also will strive to ensure that the Forest Service’s pending decision
on closing roads to motorized vehicles will take into account that
retaining a certain level of access benefits retail businesses that
rely on recreationists.
We share Kerns’ concern about the threat of catastrophic wildfires in
the county — especially on the east face of the Elkhorns, which shelter
the headwaters of streams that supply much of the irrigation water that
Baker Valley farmers and ranchers depend on.
Kerns contends, and we agree, that the Forest Service should strive to
protect those streams just as the agency did with its forest thinning
and other work in Baker City’s watershed during the past several years.
We don’t subscribe to the notion, which we hear from certain quarters,
that America’s very survival might well rest on the result of this
But the condition of our economy for the next couple years sure does.
And that matters a lot to all of us.
After comparing the two candidates’ prescriptions for our ailing
financial system, we’re convinced that Americans would fare better
under a John McCain administration than under one led by Barack Obama.
That’s why we urge voters to cast their ballots for McCain.
The most significant difference between McCain’s and Obama’s economic platforms involves their tax plans.
McCain thinks all Americans should turn over a smaller percentage of their income to the federal government.
Obama thinks people who make less than $250,000 per year should pay a
smaller percentage, but people who earn more than that should pay a
larger percentage — about 3 percent more of their income, from 36
percent to 39 percent.
|<< Start < Previous page 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 Next page > End >>|