Caring about schools, or just stirring the pot?
Do Mr. McComb, Mr. Dielman, or Mrs. Moses really care about the school situation or do they just like to stir the pot? After reading their letters to the editor, I have decided they just like stirring the pot and talking negatively about everyone they don’t support. I don’t personally know any of the three, however I do know a few of the candidates they are bashing on. In my opinion there are multiple well-qualified candidates running for the school board and a few of them have been targets of these three individuals. Do they have children in the school? What is the reason they are bashing several candidates that have children in the school. These candidates want the best for their children and the children of this community.
That brings me to another topic that bothers me. I would like to know if any of these three voted to pass the levy for a new school. Did they support that levy or did they write letters to the editor against the levy? If the community really cared about our kids and their education I feel that levy would have passed. It’s my understanding the majority of property owning residents of Baker would be paying approximately $16 a month for a new school. I know Baker City citizens pay a monthly sidewalk fee to maintain our sidewalks, why can’t we pony up a few more dollars for our kids? In the words of the late, great Whitney Houston, “I believe the children are our future.”
Where are our priorities Baker City? If the citizens of Baker really cared about our kids we would be in the process of building a new middle school. We wouldn’t have a problem with adding sixth-graders to an overcrowded and run-down Middle School if we just built a new one. I agree with Ogan and McKim. Why can’t we support candidates without bashing on the others? There has already been enough of that on the school board. I say vote for whoever you feel is the best candidate and may the best person be elected.
Legislature thwarts local decision on GMO crops
Recently I sent an email to Senator Ferrioli stating I was disappointed in his “yes” vote on Senate Bill 633. What was SB 633? Jackson County wanted an initiative that would allow them to stop GMO crops from being planted in their county. Having a county, city or citizens be in charge of decisions that affect them did not set well with some legislators. We were part of a group that met with Senator Ferrioli before the vote. When the subject of GMO came up. His reply was “I have enough information from two sources. That’s not open for discussion.” When we left his office, the corridors were lined with lobbyists.
Following is the answer to my email from Senator Ferrioli. “Mr. Miller, I am sorry to learn of your disappointment with my vote on SB 633, but I submit this to you in my defense. Your email to me is of a technical level well beyond the capacity of Baker County staff to interpret. How could they possibly administer a management program that would deal with all the potential applications of genetic modification of agricultural products? Who would pay for such a program of administration? Apply the local control argument to the Center for Disease Control. Would it make sense to conduct epidemiological studies at the county level with the resulting patchwork of response? I think not! Ted Ferrioli.”
We exchanged more emails. All the unedited emails are being posted here: www.larryRmiller.com. If I were an administrator or county official, I would consider his reply a slap in the face. To become law, the House of Representatives has to pass their version: HB 3192. If you’re concerned about health, your children’s health, future generations and personal liberty, contact your representative. Do your own GMO investigating. Be sure you know who funded the research. Here’s a good place to start: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/sep/28/study-gm-maize-cancer. SB 633 and HB 3192 go far beyond GMO. If the state overrides local opinion on this, what freedoms and liberties will be next?
Cassidy has the qualities we want in school board member
We want to include our names to the list of Kevin Cassidy supporters. What our community should seek and expect from a Baker 5J School board member are these qualities:
1. Thoughtful, careful and respectful consideration of all issues
2. Steady and calm demeanor
3. Ability to listen
4. Desire to fix problems, rather than create them
5. Strong support for students, staff and the community
6. Knowledge of budget, finance, and available resources
Kevin Cassidy demonstrates these qualities. We have known Kevin for close to 40 years and can personally vouch for his credibility as a strong, solid civic leader. We are supporting Kevin because he would be an asset to the Baker 5J School Board. We urge you to vote and when doing so, make Kevin Cassidy your choice.
Randy and Joanne Crutcher
Abell, Cassidy have outstanding qualifications
Having been public school teachers and a bank officer for over 30 years, we want to express our concern over the upcoming school board election. We urge the choice of Rosemary Abell and Kevin Cassidy for school board members because of their outstanding qualifications.
Rosemary Abell has by far the most excellent educational background, having experience as a teacher, administrator and consultant at the local, state and national levels. This school board needs someone with her expertise and experience.
Kevin Cassidy has the business background and leadership qualities to cover that aspect of school board membership. He is a graduate of BHS and EOU with a bachelor’s degree in business/economics, has owned his own company and has worked for ODOT in administration policy and budgetary planning. He has a young son and is active in the Haines PTCO.
For these reasons we strongly urge you to vote for Rosemary Abell and Kevin Cassidy. Their education, experience and integrity would truly benefit the Baker 5J School Board.
Alden Keith Taylor
Nancy Ann Taylor
No matter where Idaho Power Company routes its new power line through Northeastern Oregon — and we have no doubt the 500-kilovolt line will be built — some people will be mad.
A major power line pretty much defines the concept of NIMBY — Not In My Backyard. The trouble, of course, is that every place is someone’s backyard, whether or not that’s literally true.
Idaho Power’s proposed Boardman-to-Hemingway project (B2H) has gone through several permutations since the Boise company proposed it six years ago.
People need to take responsibility for themselves
After reading Monday’s paper, I find myself wondering does anyone take responsibility for themselves or their causes anymore. There have been several cases in point come to the publics attention lately.
1: A few days ago an article in the paper pointed out HBC had received $600 in grants for flowers, and they were requesting donations of money and labor to plant flowers in the downtown flower boxes. If you need more, get it from your members and while you’re at it ask them to purchase and plant the flowers in front of their own business, don’t ask me. It is for their benefit to beautify their storefront.
2: The sidewalk fee is up for renewal, why do we have to offer to pay someone to build or repair their existing sidewalk in order to get them to address the situation, rather than tell them to be responsible for their property. I maintain my property, you do likewise.
3: In Monday’s paper two more cases in point. The local spay/neuter fund, a worthy cause, wants each citizen to pay $4 per year for their cause, have you ever heard of a fundraiser, do a car wash, or bake sale. It is a worthy cause, but mine is paying my utility bills.
4: Also in Monday’s paper Eagle Creek Orchard suffered frost damage to their crop. Well I feel sorry for them, so did I and I depend on my fruit trees to feed me and my wife. I’m not asking my neighbors to pay for it. You’re a business, buy crop insurance, and you ought to know when you own a business it’s a gamble, you’re the one making the profit you’re the one who suffers the loss as well.
Now, last but not least, my wife and I exist on Social Security and $14 a month in food stamps and the government wants to cut the cost of living raises for Social Security. I can’t afford to take a vacation let alone pay for every one else’s problems, and causes. If all of you asking for others to pay for your troubles want another cause, believe me I will gladly accept all cash donations.
5J candidate urges voters to decide on qualifications
I am concerned about the way in which the “non-partisan” Baker 5J School Board election continues to be “politicized.” In all types of elections, I vote for those candidates that I feel are most qualified and experienced for the positions they are running to fill. Though I did not ask for anyone to write letters of endorsement, I am honored that some did so.
I have spent most of my professional life working in education at the local, state and national levels, as a teacher and curriculum and assessment leader. I am quite familiar with the Common Core State Standards that Oregon has adopted. In fact, I have written assessment items aligned to them and have developed “crosswalks” to compare them to other state and national standards (e.g., the National Teachers of Mathematics Standards). Some of the work of which I am most proud is related to the education of students with significant cognitive disabilities. In addition, I have experience working with large state budgets in Oregon and Washington. I care deeply about K-12 education, especially in Baker City, and am passionate that all students are given adequate opportunity to learn and progress.
My husband Larry and I have invested much in this community. It is the place we call home. We have owned the Pythian Castle, at the corner of First and Washington, for close to 11 years and have worked hard to renovate it, so that another Baker City landmark might be preserved.
I urge you to set aside the “perceived” politics of each candidate and who did or did not endorse each of them. I urge you to look at the qualifications and experiences of each candidate and decide what is important to you in making your choice. I urge you to cast a vote in the Baker 5J School Board election, and vote for the candidates of your choice.
The writer is a candidate for Position 4 on the Baker School Board.
Baker School Board election is being manipulated
Our present school board election is still being manipulated by the same people responsible for the campaign recall dedicated school board members that disrupted our community, Kerry McQuisten, Suzan Ellis Jones (also committee chair for Baker County Republicans) and Kyle Knight, who has actively put up yard signs to elect Ogan and McKim. Knight is associated with Western Liberty Network (WLN). This is an organization that is backed by billionaire David Koch, who advocates privatization of our schools.
Knight, who had taken the training from WLN, was given a monetary award by this organization for overcoming adversity while in office after the recall election. If Ogan and McKim are elected I fear they will vote with Knight and be a majority on all school board matters.
Rosemary Abell and Kevin Cassidy are well qualified and have no hidden agenda beyond promoting and improving our Baker County schools.
Be sure to read U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden’s letter concerning anonymous campaign cash in the Record Courier May 9, 2013, issue. This is undermining our democracy and is happening here in Baker City.
Election not about red vs. blue, but best candidates
Elections can go from political in the best sense (choices between options) to the worst (moving from facts to destructive accusations) and leaving voters confused or in the dark. Thankfully, the Herald on May 1 printed lengthy candidate statements which helped me determine the choice of candidates discussed in my letter of May 10. I apparently raised the ire of Suzan Ellis Jones, chair of the local GOP, who had “officially” endorsed a different slate of candidates. Due to this political endorsement, I thought readers deserved to know about the new leadership of the GOP (see Herald/Local Briefing, Nov. 16, 2012) and their connection to the tea party and to the recall election. In fact, one of Jones’ 5J slate and many of those writing in favor of it signed the recall petition (which is public information).
In response to Jones’ charges, I will clarify that the tea party in Oregon is not a party but rather a movement with affiliated groups and persons, the majority of which do vote Republican. I never doubted that the local GOP leadership got there for a term of up to 25 months through a process set out in state law. This does not mean, however, that many local Republicans are not distressed about it nor that most local Republicans share their views. Regarding her implied denial that any GOP officer is affiliated with the tea party, check out the discussion of new GOP Treasurer Kyle Knight as “the youngest chapter leader” in a front page Record Courier article on April 22, 2010, headlined “Americans for Prosperity Hold Local Tea Party by Suzan Ellis Jones.”
About Jones’ destructive accusations that I and a few other citizens are “intent on slinging mud” and “keeping the school board ‘blue at all costs,’ ” note that neither candidate I recommended is a Democrat although at least one Democrat is running.
If we want the school board back on track, we must choose levelheaded candidates who will build on the educational and financial success of the district and push it further along in the positive direction it was already going.
President Obama has had better weeks than this one.
Pretty much every week, actually, including many when he didn’t even win an election, sign a healthcare reform law, or have Osama bin Laden killed.
First, the White House press corps has roused from its months-long slumber about last year’s terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, reporters having detected the scent of scandal much as sharks recognize a splash of blood in the sea.
Second, with the revelation that the IRS has been acting the way the IRS acts in movies and novels but hardly anywhere else, the Justice Department is looking into whether tax bureaucrats’ targeting of tea party groups was illegal as well as politically idiotic.
Even by the lofty standards of the presidency, where public relations crises arrive with metronomic regularity, the two preceding blunders would constitute an especially troublesome period.
Protect our public schools from conservative campaign
Are our public schools in danger once again? I’m concerned that the current 5J School Board election could produce the result that last December’s failed 5J recall could not.
How else am I to interpret the enthusiastic endorsements of Mike Ogan and Rich McKim by recall leader Kerry McQuisten and recall treasurer Suzan Ellis Jones which appeared in our local papers even before the ballots arrived? What else explains the integrated ticket of Ogan and McKim, featuring shared campaign literature and companion yard signs?
McQuisten stated, “We need to elect both, not just one of these candidates, in order to see a substantial change at 5J.” What does she mean? Could it be she knows that existing board member Kyle Knight, plus Ogan, and McKim would form a majority of three on the five-member school board? Is that why Knight distributed the Ogan and McKim yard signs in my neighborhood?
It’s important to understand that the recall and Kyle Knight are associated with and supported by the Tea Party, Americans for Prosperity, and the Western Liberty Network (WLN), which has proclaimed its intention to “take charge” of Baker County. According to their web site, the Western Liberty Network in January gave to “...Kyle Knight, elected to the Baker City School Board after taking WLN training, an award for overcoming adversity while in office....”
Americans for Prosperity is funded by arch-conservative billionaire David H. Koch who advocates privatization of our schools.
Last year’s experience offered ample demonstration of the divisive and reckless acts of those seeking to undermine our schools and the best interests of our community in pursuit of their ideological agenda.
Our award-winning schools are among our most valuable assets to attract and retain energetic young families in Baker Valley. The recognition of our model schools and our Oregon Teacher of the Year are testimony to their quality and their contribution to a promising future for us all. Let us be sure to protect that heritage.
5J candidates ask for a positive campaign
We collectively wondered who would become negative first. Mr. Dielman wins the prize. The six candidates all agreed any two of us would be a positive move, and that the bickering must stop. Life seems pleasant among the six of us candidates.
Recent letters suffered from flaws in critical thinking. They take a fact, such that as we are conservative, add several guesses, false info, and have invented an entire scary story. What if two candidates were seen eating downtown together last week? Would that be more controversy? No.
Neither McComb, Moses, nor Dielman decided to ask us about any of their fiction. They have resorted to fear, inventing stories to scare people. We’re wondering if someone will play the “gender card” next, saying we’re unqualified because we’re male. (But wouldn’t that be sexist?)
Perhaps some folks were listening to the quiet heckling from the back of the AAUW forum.
We got our introduction to robust thinking from Mrs. Dielman in the early ’80s. Thankfully it stuck.
Sooo, to clarify:
1: We still hope to earn endorsement from others of any political stripe in this non-partisan race. This is about educating kids for a tough world out there. We are about unity of effort for the students. We owe allegiance to the public, and no organization. All six candidates have endorsements. It’s (mostly) positive opinion from citizens supporting their candidate.
2: Some want people to panic over a “3-2 majority.” The board has one now. Big deal. Again, this is a non-partisan race. The 10 percent on both ends must stop trying to control the 80 percent of us in the middle.
3: We graduated from, had, and still have kids in the 5J system. We are running for a seat to improve it in challenging times.
Thank you, and keep it positive.
Both writers are candidates for the Baker School Board. Ogan is running for Position 3, McKim for Position 4.
After researching, Ogan and McKim are my choices
I would like to respond to our longstanding liberal, Suzanne Moses, on her Friday letter to the editor. I couldn’t imagine anyone being as bad as she said Mike Ogan and Rich McKim were, and running for the school board. Oh dear! So I did some checking into the background of both Ogan and McKim.
I would like to thank you, Suzanne, you really opened my eyes. I am sure glad I didn’t cast my ballot yet. After vetting all of the people running for the school board, Ogan and McKim are my picks by far. If it wasn’t for you, Suzanne, I would have voted for Rosemary Abell and Kevin Cassidy. Oh the shame of it all, what a mistake that would have been.
Now I am voting for strong, conservative, very principled candidates, with strong financial backgrounds, dedicated to turning a very negative atmosphere into a positive, can-do leadership. No backroom deals with these two boys, no sir, we need to deal with the positives and round-file the negatives.
Even though we cut one school day a week, and laid of 25 teachers, we have increased our per student cost $1,300 per child. Didn’t I hear that the administrators got a raise?
In the past seven years our math performance has steadily dropped by 14 percent. The 5J District has problems that need a strong leadership, this is why I am voting for Mike Ogan and Rich McKim. Check ’em out and vote for leadership and strength.
Brass quintet put on quite a show for Baker audience
Baker Community Concerts presented a big hit to an appreciative audience Friday night at the high school auditorium. The Presidio Brass, five of the best horn players one could ever hope to hear, presented a dynamic program of classics and jazz on a variety of brass instruments. Kudos to the tubist-pianist who also is the sole arranger responsible for making music written for symphony orchestra, string quartet, opera, jazz, or science fiction movies fit the instrumentation of this small group of five horns.
On another note, the 14th Van Cliburn International Piano Competition will be held in Fort Worth, Texas, May 21-June 9. The good news is that one does not have to go to Fort Worth to attend.
It will be available via: e-mail (
), live webcast, Facebook, and Twitter. This is a musical phenomenon to enjoy and appreciate.
Had you paid attention only to the recent spate of letters to the editor on this page, and to comments posted on the Herald’s website (www.bakercityherald.com), you would have ample reason to believe that the Baker School Board is comparable, in partisan political terms, to the U.S. Senate or the Oregon Legislature.
The school board, as it should be, is a non-partisan body.
We say “as it should be” because overseeing the management of a school district, which is what the board does, is a task for which neither Republicans nor Democrats, neither liberals nor conservatives, have any special acumen.
Yet the implication of some of the letters we’ve published recently, and of some online comments, is that a candidate’s party affiliation or political philosophy determines whether he or she is worthy of this office.
We don’t believe this is the case.
Based on the six candidates’ written responses to the Herald’s questionnaire, which were printed on Pages 6A and 7A of the May 1 edition, and on their statements during a public forum on April 30, we believe each of the six candidates — Rosemary Abell, Rick Stout, Kevin Cassidy, Mike Ogan, Karen Spencer and Richard McKim — could be an effective board member.
We hope voters who have yet to fill out their ballots will be influenced not by letters and comments which have more to do with the writer’s political ideology than with the Baker School Board, but rather that voters will base their choices largely on the candidates’ own words and accomplishments. We’ve been impressed as well by the several thoughtful letters we’ve published which emphasize candidates’ strengths rather than their opponents’ alleged weaknesses.
We’re not suggesting that there’s no place for criticism even in a non-partisan campaign.
But concerns are about a candidate’s fitness for office are much more credible when they’re based on the candidate’s actual statements or actions which are directly related to the duties of a school board member. Critiques which focus instead on the candidates’ supposed political positions, or worse yet, on those of their supporters, ring hollow in our ears, and, we hope, in the ears of undecided voters.
Ogan has numbers sense
Mike Ogan is a candidate for Position 3 in the upcoming 5J School Board election. Mike has been in banking and finance for 25 years . He is a real numbers man. 5J has not enjoyed the presence of such a person on the board in my recent memory. Mike will prove to be an invaluable addition to the 5J Board. I would like to urge everyone interested in a quality school board to vote for Mike Ogan.
Carl R. Kostol
Join me in voting for Karen Spencer and Kevin Cassidy
I know Karen Spencer and I know Kevin Cassidy.
Karen is my neighbor, and I’ve known Kevin and his family for several years. I know they’re both intelligent, dedicated, hard-working and committed candidates for 5J School Board. I know they have no hidden agendas and have not formed any pre-election coalitions.
I look forward to seeing them bring their attributes to the board, the students, the staff, and the community. We need them.
Although they have neither one solicited my vote, they have it. Please give them yours.
Cassidy would bring passion, knowledge to school board
Kevin Cassidy would be a great addition to Baker School District 5J School Board. He is an involved parent, community member and forward thinking individual.
I have had the pleasure of working with Kevin when I served on the Parent-Teacher-Community Organization (PTCO) Board at Haines Elementary and as his child’s teacher. Kevin is very inquisitive and stays current in the research regarding best practices in the classroom.
Currently, there are many changes affecting our profession. Kevin has been in classrooms, visited with teachers and asked the tough questions of administration to make sure we are keeping our vision of providing an equitable and engaging education for students.
He recognizes hard work and endorses staff dedication. I have witnessed his ability to be a collaborative participant in meetings. Kevin has a gift for listening to others’ ideas and thoughts. He listens for understanding and not rebuttal.
He is passionate about children and will do his research to bring informed knowledge to the decision-making process. When you are part of a school district that exemplifies greatness, one must do their best to maintain that standard.
With his admirable work ethic, reliable community involvement, and noticeable desire to support a community who cares deeply about the profession of educating children, Kevin is clearly the most-qualified candidate to serve our school board in Position 3.
of the Year 2013
Don’t forget to vote, but not for Ogan or McKim
Voters in the school board election will decide whether the politics of divide and conquer will prevail or whether the community will choose a school board committed to working for children and away from internal conflict. With this in mind, I myself will be voting for Rosemary Abell and Kevin Cassidy, largely because of their excellent qualifications and demonstrated track records of public service and educational involvement.
Forgive me for being blunt. I hope voters will vote for anyone but McKim and Ogan, who were endorsed by Kyle Knight supporters Kerry and David McQuisten and Suzan Ellis Jones in letters to the Herald editor/May 3. Electing anyone endorsed by these individuals is like admitting the fox into the hen house due to their central role (along with Kyle Knight) in bringing you the divisive and wasteful recall election that voters defeated last fall. So I hope you will look to demonstrated skills and qualifications in the candidate statements (Herald/May 3) because you can be sure, a fox will present himself in the best possible light and will even promise to cooperate with chickens.
Suzan Ellis Jones signed her letter, “Chair, on behalf of the Baker County Republican Central Committee” but many voters may be unaware that all four of the leadership positions of the Baker County Republican Party (Central Committee) were taken over by recall petition circulators allied with the Tea Party last fall — to the dismay of many lifelong Baker Republicans. Whether you view this as bad news or good news, just be aware that “This ain’t your father’s Republican Party.”
Above all, please cast your ballot. Heavy balloting is the best way to keep extreme candidates from forming a new three-to-two majority on your school board, and school kids would surely be the losers.
Spring has traditionally been the season for armies to attack, as soon as the ground is firm enough that their horses and field guns and tanks won’t bog down.
It’s also the season when invaders of a different sort launch their annual onslaught across the borders of my modest piece of land, which is in most respects a tranquil place where not much of a martial sort happens except between a little boy and his older sister.
I’m referring to weeds.
This seasonal offensive includes the common culprits — the brazen dandelion painting its yellow graffiti across my well-tended lawn, the milkweed posing as innocent crocus, the ground ivy (alias: dollar weed) thrusting stubborn taproots a foot into the soil.
(I’m convinced that a ground ivy taproot could support the weight of a ’59 Cadillac if tied to the Caddy’s bumper.)
The past several springs, though, these familiar foes have been joined by ones more sinister — weeds whose ugly mugs show up on the sorts of “most wanted” posters once reserved for fugitives who hold up stagecoaches or rob banks.
“Noxious” is the usual adjective applied to these weeds, and it’s a word which to my ear perfectly captures the plants’ unpleasant nature.
(This is typical of words ending in “ous” — jealous, for instance, and unctuous.)
Their vanguard was whitetop. It crept in among the vinca vines on the west side of the house and I didn’t recognize it until one stalk had erupted in the white blossoms that give the weed its common name (it also goes by “hoary cress” and by a variety of vernaculars which are unsuitable for this publication).
When I realized that it was indeed whitetop, the most infamous noxious weed in Baker County, I felt violated — as if I had walked into my living room and found a stranger there, sprawled on my sofa, eating my chips and drinking my beer.
A couple weeks ago I found a few whitetop seedlings poking through the red cinders on the east side of the house, they apparently having ridden in on the same evil wind that delivered others to the opposite side.
Fortunately, whitetop is relatively easy to confine on a city lot like mine, if you yank it before it goes to seed.
A more recent, and more insidious, invader is bur buttercup.
Whoever named this scourge got the “bur” part right enough — the weed’s tiny flowers, after blooming, turn into sharp burs.
But even though those blooms are yellow, as a buttercup’s are, I see no reason to impugn the buttercup, a perfectly innocuous plant, by lending its name to a nasty, foot-puncturing weed.
Sadly, and inexplicably, the taxonomic authorities rarely consult me on such matters.
Bur buttercup hardly poses any great risk to the sanctity of my grounds, of course.
With a mere 9,000 square feet to watch over — that’s one-fifth of an acre, and much of it’s covered by a house anyway — eradicating a patch of weeds requires a bit of effort with a shovel or metal rake, none of it terribly taxing.
(And spraying herbicide is easier still — especially since my father-in-law owns the sprayer.)
But my skirmishes with noxious weeds have given me a new appreciation for how monumental the task is of trying to combat their spread on vastly larger scales.
Baker County, for instance, which covers 2 million acres, or about 10 million of my home lots.
Considering noxious weeds can hitch a ride on everything from a deer’s flanks to a heifer’s hooves to the tires on my four-wheel drive, it seems a minor miracle that the county isn’t overrun with whitetop and the like.
(Although in places the battle clearly is over, and the weeds have won.)
The word “weed” is a troublesome one in one respect.
There’s nothing inherently evil about a dandelion, for example. My aversion to the species is purely aesthetic and therefore not altogether rational.
A case could be made that I’d be better off growing dandelions than grass — at least you can eat dandelions.
You can even make wine from them, although, as I mentioned, I’m more of a beer man myself.
But there’s little to recommend weeds such as bur buttercup, which crowd out native grasses and forbs that wild animals as well as domestic livestock like to eat.
Besides which, many noxious weeds are toxic.
Government agencies and private landowners have been tussling with weeds for decades and, as with most wars, the momentum shifts, with counterattacks being mounted to reclaim hill and valley alike.
It’s a good fight, and one worth waging.
My part in this is negligible, with nothing at stake but my landscaping. But I keep at it, and relish the occasional ambush when I catch a patch of ground ivy unawares and get the whole root, straight from the rich soil.
Jayson Jacoby is editor
of the Baker City Herald.
Ogan can find solutions
Mike Ogan has been an involved parent in the school district for many years. Currently he has a child enrolled in the Baker School District.
Mike has served on several school board committees and has attended numerous school board meetings over the past few years. This has given him an insight into some of the most pressing issues our school district is facing, and additional challenges that are on the horizon. He has a realistic view of these issues and a practical approach to finding real solutions.
Mike will not only advocate for the best education of our children, he will represent his constituents by obtaining factual information and making a sound decision based on that information.
Mike Ogan is a straight forward candidate and by supporting him you will have a voice on the 5J School Board.
Vote for Abell, Cassidy
Candidate Richard McKim says with good reason, “The public is sick of their school district making the news.”
Well, School District 5J Board member Kyle Knight and School District critic Kerry McQuisten are the ones who caused most of that negative news.
Last year they were the prime persons behind the attempt to recall two school board members. The voters defeated the recall by a wide margin.
What Knight and McQuisten could not accomplish through a recall, they are now trying to accomplish by endorsing the election of McKim and Mike Ogan as a team. McQuisten has publicly endorsed them, and Knight helped put up their election signs around town.
If you voted against the recall, then the possibility of Knight, McKim, and Ogan forming a majority on the Board should be all the reason you need to fill Position 4 with Rosemary Abell, who has by far the best educational credentials of all four candidates for that position, and to fill Position 3 with the well-qualified Kevin Cassidy, who is Ogan’s sole opponent.
The last thing our excellent schools need is a school district board chaired by Kyle Knight.
Keep sidewalk program
I’d like to see the City Council and the public works department continue the sidewalk program for awhile longer, and not just abandon this project so soon. The sidewalks are too valuable a part of our town’s infrastructure to see them deteriorate further. Sidewalks serve the public in general, not just individual property owners.
We were able to take advantage of the city’s generous discount which helped replace 100 feet of sidewalk in front of our house and we feel it was well worth what we ended up paying, not to mention we gave a few people a temporary job in this difficult economy. I applaud Barbara Johnson for supporting good sidewalks in her lone vote at the council meeting.
I agree with her that our sidewalks need to gradually improve, not just for the beauty of our town, but also for public safety. Many people, myself included, have fallen down from tripping on cracks or gravely walks.
If the fund does continue, perhaps the city could give a deeper discount or an easy payment plan or even a lien for those unable to pay all at once. If it isn’t possible for the fund to continue, then maybe the city could devote some of its general funds to the goal of repairing at least the very worst ones over time.
Gun policy is important
You would think that after recent school shootings and the resulting gun battle in Congress that during the recent forum with school board candidates the district’s weapons policy would rate more than a couple of sentences.
I wasn’t there, but according to the story, someone asked about the weapons policy and Karen Spencer responded “that it was too soon to tell what the state and federal government will dictate, but that the district ‘is doing everything to keep our kids safe.’ ”
That’s great. It’s good to know that everything is being done, but as a grandfather who might have another grandchild in the 5J district in a few years I would like to hear a few details about that “everything.”
It is true that the state might change a few rules, it’s a given that as Jefferson said nobody is safe when the Legislature is in session and Portland lefty Ginny Burdick always has an antigun bill or two and one of those leaves it up to local districts on a weapons policy, which means Oregon’s left-leaning cities will prohibit and some Eastern counties will get on with maybe arming teachers, hiring armed guards or other plans.
So again what is that actual policy going to be? Having just one candidate respond wasn’t very good investigative reporting. Where did the other candidates stand? Why or why not should someone vote for or against them on the most important issue facing schools these days?
Elect Rosemary Abell
Undoubtedly each candidate for School Board would serve well, if elected, but I ask voters to consider Rosemary Abell.
Abell is an educational consultant who taught in public school systems and worked for state departments of education.
Additionally, she acted as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Education, research institutions and school districts.
Abell’s qualifications surely influence my vote, and I hope yours. For wise decision making on the 5J School Board, elect Rosemary Abell for a four-year term.
Best bang for tax dollars
I am voting for Mike Ogan and Richard McKim for the following reasons.
They both have children in the 5J school system and will be very proactive to ensure that 5J students receive the best education possible.
They both are graduates from the 5J system.
They both have very strong financial and management credentials. They both have expressed that they want a stronger community involvement in the 5J school district.
Therefore, for the best bang for your tax dollars and to promote an excellent education in the 5J system, vote for Mike Ogan and Richard McKim.